Full opinion text
PER CURIAM: The National Labor Relations Board found that respondent, Animal Foods Company of Texas, Inc., violated ยงยง 8 (a) (1) and 8(a) (3) of the National Labor Relations Act, by coercive interrogation of certain employees and by an allegedly discriminatory discharge of an employee by the name of Peeler. The Board petitions for enforcement of its order. The findings of the Board are supported by the record, considered as a whole, Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 71 S.Ct. 456, 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951); NLRB v. Camco, Inc., 5 Cir., 1965, 340 F.2d 803, cert. denied 382 U.S. 926, 86 S.Ct. 313, 15 L.Ed.2d 339; NLRB v. Certain-Teed Products Corp., 5 Cir., 1968, 387 F.2d 639 [January 12, 1968]; NLRB v. West Point Manufacturing Company, 5 Cir., 1957, 245 F.2d 783. Enforced.