Shamas v. Bundy (401 So. 2d 1161, 1981)

PER CURIAM.

We agree with the trial court’s ruling granting a motion for involuntary dismissal at the conclusion of the opponents’ case on the ground that they had failed to make a prima facie showing that the challenged will had been procured by undue influence. See, Heasley v. Evans, 104 So.2d 854, 857 (Fla.2d DCA 1958); see generally, In re Estate of Carpenter, 253 So.2d 697 (Fla.1971).

Affirmed.