Tweed v. State (445 So. 2d 347, 1983)

PER CURIAM.

This case comes to us on appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Appellant has filed a handwritten letter which we have treated as a supplemental brief. Having reviewed the Anders brief, appellant’s pro se brief and the record on appeal, we find no reversible error with respect to the judgment and sentence. Accordingly, we affirm.

HOBSON, A.C.J., and SCHEB and RYDER, JJ., concur.