Willis v. State (640 So. 2d 1188, 1994)

PER CURIAM.

Willis contends that the trial court erred in imposing conditions of probation in the written judgment and sentence which were not orally pronounced at sentencing. We reverse the sentence and remand for resolution of the discrepancy. See Cleveland v. State, 617 So.2d 1166 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DAUKSCH, PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.