McNabb v. State (689 So. 2d 371, 1997)

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the various arguments presented by the appellant in this direct criminal appeal, we affirm his convictions. We reject his argument pursuant to Coney v. State, 653 So.2d 1009 (Fla.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 315, 133 L.Ed.2d 218 (1995), because the record is insufficient to show that peremptory challenges were exercised. See Ganyard v. State, 686 So.2d 1361 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).

MINER, ALLEN and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.