Mendes v. State (734 So. 2d 1168, 1999)

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary denial of Appellant’s motion for postconviction relief as legally insufficient. The motion did not include all the information required by rule 3.850(c). However, our affirmance is without prejudice to Appellant’s refiling an amended motion that complies with the requirements of the rule. See Jones v. State, 708 So.2d 1045 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).

DELL, STEVENSON and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.