Riggens v. State (805 So. 2d 1082, 2002)

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Atwater v. State, 788 So.2d 223, 227 (Fla.2001) (“[Hjabeas corpus petitions are not to be used for additional appeals on questions which could have been, should have been, or were raised on appeal or in a rule 3.850 motion, or on matters that were not objected to at trial”) (quoting Parker v. Dugger, 550 So.2d 459, 460 (Fla.1989)).

THOMPSON, C.J., PETERSON and PLEUS, JJ., concur.