Adlington v. State (840 So. 2d 354, 2003)

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order of the trial court denying appellant’s motion to correct an illegal sentence on the authority of Bover v. State, 797 So.2d 1246, 1248-49 (Fla.2001), which held that “if a habitual offender sentence is imposed when, as a matter of law, the defendant was not subject to habitualization, the resulting habitual offender sentence can be corrected as illegal provided the error is apparent from, the face of the record.” (citation omitted) (emphasis added). Here, the error alleged is hot apparent on the face of the record.

WARNER, KLEIN and GROSS, JJ, concur.