Carruthers v. State (972 So. 2d 1035, 2008)

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. In this appeal pursuant to An-ders, Defendant’s pro se briefs raise issues of involuntary plea which were not preserved for appeal by his pro se rule 3.170(Z) motion to withdraw plea. This affirmance is without prejudice to his right to assert them in a timely and sufficient rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief.

SHAHOOD, C.J., GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.

. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).