Masters v. Traders National Bank of Rochester (221 A.D. 785, 1927)

Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, on the ground that although the action involves a controversy arising under the laws of the United States (Chesbrough v. Woodworth, 244 U. S. 73) it is not shown that the controversy under the laws of the United States exceeds the sum or value of $3,000, exclusive of interest and costs. (U. S. Code, tit. 28, § 41, subd. 1.) All concur. Present — Hubbs, P. J., Sears, Crouch, Taylor and Sawyer, JJ.

See, also, U. S. Judicial Code (36 U. S. Stat. at Large, 1091), § 24, subd. 1.— [Rep.