Foreman v. Foreman (223 A.D. 783, 1928)

New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division 1928-03

Citations

Full opinion text

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Rich, Young and Carswell, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Seeger, J., dissent upon the ground that the rule in Woolley v. Stewart (222 N. Y. 347) and Burns v. McCormick (233 id. 230) is not applicable in a ease where the agreement is between husband and wife.