Rast v. Pipe (225 A.D. 825, 1929)

New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division 1929-01

Citations

Full opinion text

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young and Hagarty, JJ., concur; Kapper, J., dissents upon the ground that the alleged contract for the additional 4,000 machines is indefinite and lacks mutuality.