Claim of Borton v. McClintic Marshall Co. (226 A.D. 709, 1929)

Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. . Van Kirk, P. J., Davis, Hill and Hasbrouek, JJ., concur; Hinman, J., dissents on the ground that there is no evidence to sustain the finding that the claimant was the common-law wife of deceased; and on the authority of Hill v. Vrooman (215 App. Div. 847; affd., 242 N. Y. 549).