City of Schenectady v. Beckwith (227 A.D. 644, 1929)

New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division 1929-06

Citations

Full opinion text

Order affirmed, with costs. Van Kirk, P. J., Whitmyer and Hill, JJ., concur; Hinman and Hasbrouck, JJ., dissent on the ground that it was the duty of the commissioners to consider lots Nos. 16 and 17 as a unit in making their award.