Drexler-Rochester Properties, Inc. v. Paris (235 A.D. 892, 1932)

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, on the ground that none of the information sought to be obtained by the notice appears to be material to the proof of the cause of action against Paris, and that as to Katsampes it would be immaterial because they did not sign the contract under seal upon which the complaint rests. (Crowley v. Lewis, 239 N. Y. 264.) All concur.