Cornell v. Acme Road Machinery Co. (238 A.D. 767, 1933)

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Sears, P. J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the law on the ground that the reception in evidence of the letter, Exhibit 4, and the testimony of the witness Wright, in view of the sharply contested questions of fact, constituted reversible error.