Citations

Full opinion text

McLaughlin, J.:

This action was brought to recover the proceeds received by the defendant from the sale of certain pianos alleged to have belonged to the Muehlfeld & Haynes Piano Company. The complaint charged that between the 20th day of August, 1895, and the 10th day of February, 1896, the Muehlfeld & Haynes Piano Company, á domestic corporation, of which the plaintiff, since said dates, has been appointed receiver, delivered to the defendant certain pianos to be sold by him as its agent; that he sold the pianos, received the proceeds, and neglected and refused to pay over the same, notwithstanding a demand had been made therefor. The answer was a general denial.

The defendant had a verdict, and from the judgment entered thereon, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, the plaintiff has appealed.

Upon the trial it appeared that, prior to the dissolution of the corporation and the appointment of the plaintiff as receiver, the defendant was president of the corporation, and had the general supervision of its business. One Regal, al witness for the plaintiff, testified that he was the bookkeeper of the corporation, and as such made the entries upon page 232 of the corporation ledger ;• that such entries were made under and by direction of the defendant; that this book was in daily use, and the' defendant, at different times, looked at and examined it, including the account "upon that page. The page of the ledger was then offered and' received in evidence. It was headed “ F. Muehlfeld — Consignment