Bordes v. 170 East 106th Street Realty Corp. (203 A.D.2d 224, 1994)

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the third-party defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vinick, J.), dated January 14, 1993, as denied its cross motion to strike the third-party complaint and conditionally precluded it from offering testimony on liability unless it produced a witness for an examination before trial.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in the selection or imposition of penalties against the parties for failure to comply with disclosure orders (see, CPLR 3126; Stathoudakes v Kelmar Contr. Corp., 147 AD2d 690). Bracken, J. P., Miller, Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.