Leytman v. Glass (225 A.D.2d 550, 1996)

The determination that the petitioner wilfully and without good cause violated work relief rules by failing to report to his worksite was supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Tillman v Fahey, 53 NY2d 815; Matter of Van Leuvan v Blum, 73 AD2d 1003). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Copertino and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.