Marcella S. v. Karl T. (225 A.D.2d 557, 1996)

Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the Family Court correctly determined that the defense of "contraceptive fraud” is not relevant to the issue of paternity (see, Matter of L. Pamela P. v Frank S., 59 NY2d 1).

We have considered the appellant’s remaining contentions and find that they do not warrant reversal. Balletta, J. P., O’Brien, Ritter, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.