Silcott v. Smith (225 A.D.2d 685, 1996)

We reject the plaintiffs contention that the verdict should be set aside as against the weight of the evidence, inasmuch as the verdict was supported by a fair interpretation of the evidence (see, Cohen v Hallmark Cards, 45 NY2d 493; Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129).

The plaintiffs remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review, or without merit. Thompson, J. P., Joy, Hart and Florio, JJ., concur.