Goldman v. Weingrad (228 A.D.2d 240, 1996)

Defendants submitted documentary evidence establishing that plaintiff would be unable to establish any of the elements of a fraud cause of action (see, Zaref v Berk & Michaels, 192 AD2d 346, 348). The court’s order imposing sanctions on plaintiffs attorney in this action, for pursuing frivolous litigation satisfied the requirements of 22 NYCRR 130-1.2. We decline to impose a further sanction. Concur—Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Ross and Tom, JJ.