Holman v. Ferdinand (228 A.D.2d 441, 1996)

A proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 does not lie to review an order denying the branch of a defendant’s omnibus motion which is to suppress identification testimony (see, CPL 460.10 [1] [a]; Matter of Bull v Owens, 191 AD2d 692, 693; Matter of Hennessy v Gorman, 58 NY2d 806, 807). Ritter, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Krausman, JJ., concur.