People v. Seaya (228 A.D.2d 455, 1996)

Under the totality of the circumstances, the defendant was not denied meaningful representation by counsel (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137; People v Castro, 211 AD2d 806; People v Hayes, 186 AD2d 268). The defendant’s sentence was neither harsh nor excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Miller, J. P., Ritter, Krausman and McGinity, JJ., concur.