In re Zuckerman (23 A.D.2d 825, 1965)

This is a proceeding to discipline respondents, attorneys, based on nine charges or specifications of professional misconduct (Ros. 5-A to 5-1) arising out of the recent judicial inquiry into unethical practices of attorneys in Rassan County. The Special Referee to whom the issues were referred has held extensive hearings and has filed his report. The Referee found that one of the charges (5-A) was sustained insofar as the respondent Zuckerman was concerned, but recommended its dismissal as to the respondent Haber. As to both respondents, the Referee found that three of the other charges (5-B, 5-F and 5-H) were sustained by the proof. The Referee recommended dismissal of the remaining five charges (5-