Rosman v. Clark (27 A.D.2d 839, 1967)

—• Order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 9, 1966, reversed and motion granted, with $10 costs and disbursements. The method of service of process chosen by plaintiff is not authorized and is therefore invalid (CPLR 313, 311; Business Corporation Law, §§ 307, 306). It further appears that the facts, so far as they appear in this record, would not be sufficient basis for jurisdiction (Kramer v. Vogl, 17 N Y 2d 27; Feathers v. McLucas, 15 N Y 2d 443, 458, 464). TJghetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hopkins and Mnnder, JJ., concur.