Citations

Full opinion text

Appellants.—Judgment unanimously, affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The reclassification of petitioner’s property from B-3 to R-5 was discriminatory and not in accordance with a comprehensive plan as required by section 263 of the Town Law. (See Udell v. Haas, 21 N Y 2d 463.) (Appeal from judgment of Erie Special Term in article 78 proceeding to annul zoning determination.) Present — Goldman, P. J., Del Vecchio, Moule and Cardamone, JJ.