In re Roxroy R. (101 A.D.3d 484, 2012)

The disposition was the least restrictive dispositional alternative consistent with appellant’s needs and the community’s need for protection, and was a proper exercise of discretion (see Matter of Katherine W., 62 NY2d 947 [1984]). The underlying incident was serious and violent, and the length and conditions of probation were not unduly punitive. Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Mazzarelli, Acosta and Román, JJ.