People v. Horlback (88 A.D.3d 542, 2011)

The resentencing proceeding imposing a term of postrelease supervision was neither barred by double jeopardy nor otherwise unlawful (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]), and we do not find that term to be excessive. We have no authority to revisit defendant’s prison sentence on this appeal (see id. at 635). Concur — Saxe, J.E, Friedman, Moskowitz, Freedman and Richter, JJ.