People v. Soto (88 A.D.3d 553, 2011)

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s credibility determinations. The evidence established that an officer had a sufficient opportunity to observe defendant making a drug sale. We have considered and rejected defendant’s remaining credibility arguments. Concur — Gonzalez, PJ., Mazzarelli, Sweeny, Abdus-Salaam and Román, JJ.