In re Anizabel B. (89 A.D.3d 589, 2011)

Appellant’s challenges to the court’s suppression ruling are substantially similar to arguments this Court rejected on two companion appeals (Matter of Michael R., 87 AD3d 940 [2011]; Matter of Daniel E., 82 AD3d 639 [2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 704 [2011]), and there is no reason to reach a different result here. Concur — Tom, J.P., Saxe, Sweeny, Richter and ManzanetDaniels, JJ.