People v. Dao (9 A.D.3d 401, 2004)

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Nassau County (Brown, J.), dated July 18, 2001, which, pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The County Court’s designation of the defendant as a level three sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration Act was supported by clear and convincing evidence (see Correction Law art 6-C; People v Smith, 5 AD3d 752 [2004], lv denied 3 NY3d 602 [2004]; People v Moore, 1 AD3d 421 [2003], lv denied 2 NY3d 743 [2004]; People v Brooks, 308 AD2d 99 [2003]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. H. Miller, J.P., Goldstein, Cozier and Mastro, JJ., concur.