Paul S. v. Rita S. (92 A.D.3d 100, 2011)

OPINION OF THE COURT

Peradotto, J.

Same opinion by Peradotto, J, as in Matter of Bridget Y. (Kenneth M.Y.) ([appeal No. 1] 92 AD3d 77 [Dec. 30, 2011]).

Fahey and Sconiers, JJ., concur with Peradotto, J.; Smith, J.E, and Lindley, J., dissent in part and vote to reverse in accordance with the same dissenting opinion by Smith, J.E, as in Matter of Bridget Y. (Kenneth M.Y.) ([appeal No. 1] 92 AD3d 77 [Dec. 30, 2011]).

It is hereby ordered that said appeal insofar as it concerns Colleen Y. and Kelly Y. is dismissed and the corrected order is affirmed without costs.