Rosenberg v. Feigin (110 Cal. App. 2d 56, 1952)

District Court of Appeal of the State of California 1952-03-26

Citations

Full opinion text

HANSON, J. pro tem. The appeal is from an order denying a motion to set aside a ruling which sustained a to the third amended complaint. The order is not an appealable order (Code Civ. Proc., ยง 963; Title Ins. & Trust Co. v. California Dev. Co., 159 Cal. 484 [114 P. 838]). The appeal is dismissed. White, P. J., and Doran, J., concurred.