All-Iowa Contracting Co. v. Linear Dynamics, Inc. (296 F. Supp. 2d 969, 2003)

ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

READE, District Judge.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. INTRODUCTION.971

II. STANDARD OF REVIEW.972

III. FACTUAL BACKGROUND. CO -q cc

A. The Epoxy Supplied for the Minnesota DOT Projects B. Delivery of the Maxi-900 Epoxy Application Unit... C. Breach of Implied Warranty of Merchantability Claim Relating to the CO to -q -q cn co

Maxi-900 . -3 05

D. Model 60 Skid-Mount Epoxy Application Unit. -q os

IV. LEGAL ANALYSIS. A. Negligence Claim Relating to the Epoxy. B. Breach of Implied Warranty Claims Relating to the Epoxy. 1. The Terms of the Contract. 2. Unconscionability. C. Breach of Contract Claim Relating to the Late Delivery of the Maxi-900 D. Liquidated Damages Claims . E. Breach of Implied Warranty of Merchantability Relating to the Maxi-900 F. Breach of Implied Warranty of Merchantability Relating to the Model 60 G. Consequential Damages Claims cocococococococococo oococoooco-q-q-q-q-q MHHMO<^COOO*q*q

V.CONCLUSION.