Citations
- 474 F. Supp. 2d 758
Full opinion text
ORDER
BEATY, District Judge.
On June 28, 2006, the United States Magistrate Judge’s Order and Recommendation [Document # 30] was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Plaintiffs Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings and Dia-non Systems, Inc. filed timely Objections. [Document # 32], The Court has now reviewed the Objections and the portions of the Recommendation to which objections were made, and has made a de novo determination that is in accord with the United States Magistrate Judge’s rulings. The Court will adopt the Recommendation and transfer the case to the District of Connecticut pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction or in the Alternative to Transfer to the District of Connecticut [Document # 7] is GRANTED as to the Motion to Transfer and this case is thereby DISMISSED.
ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIASON
ELIASON, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. Facts and Claims
The central motion before the Court is defendants’ motion to have the case dismissed or, in the alternative, transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut. Defendants, a Connecticut resident and a Connecticut corporation with its principal place of business in Connecticut, contend that this Court does not have personal jurisdiction over them. They als