Citations

Full opinion text

FINDINGS OF FACT CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND JUDGMENT ADOPTING JUDICIAL PLAN FOR CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

PER CURIAM:

This is an equitable action filed on July 6, 1971, by nine citizens of the United States and of the State of Missouri against the Governor, the Secretary of State and the Attorney General of Missouri, in their official capacities.

The plaintiffs seek (1) a judgment declaring the 1969 Missouri statutes dividing the State of Missouri into ten Congressional districts to be unconstitutional, (2) an injunction restraining the defendant Secretary of State from authorizing and permitting electoral processes including future primary and general elections for Congress of the United States from the districts established by the 1969 Act and (3) a judicial redistricting of the State of Missouri into ten constitutional Congressional districts for the preliminary election processes and for the primary and general elections beginning in 1972. (The injunction sought presumably would continue until the General Assembly of Missouri enacts a constitutionally permissible plan of Congressional redistricting.)

The District Judge before whom the action was pending determined the necessity for convening a Three-Judge Court as required by § 2281, Title 28, United States Code, and requested that the Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit convene this court pursuant to § 2284, Title 28, U.S.C. On August 12, 1971, in response to this request the Honorable M. C. Matthes, Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit convened this Three-Judge Court.

Venue and jurisdiction to hear and determine this action on the merits exists under § 1391(b), § 1343(3), § 2201, Title 28, U.S.C., and under § 1983 and § 1988, Title 42, U.S.C.

In April 1969, the Supreme Court of the United States affirmed a district court decision holding the 1967 Missouri Congressional Redistricting Act unconstitutional. Kirkpatrick v. Preisler, 394 U.S. 526, 89 S.Ct. 1225, 22 L.Ed.2d 519. Following this decision the Missouri General Assembly in 1969 enacted the Congressional Redistricting Act under attack in this action. Section 128.204 to Section 128.306, inclusive, Chapter 128 RSMo. In 1970 Congressional elections were held under this 1969 Act.

When the results of the 1970 decennial census became available it was readily apparent that the districts created by the 1969 Act had become constitutionally impermissible in 1971. See Congressional District Data, Districts of the 92d Congress, Missouri, CDD-92-93, June 1971 (a United States Department of Commerce Publication). The facts underlying this conclusion have been verified as a result of the pretrial and trial proceedings herein. Because of population growth and shifts between 1960 and 1970 the disparities between Congressional districts in Missouri, and the variations from the ideal are illustrated by the following uncontroverted tabulation from the currently available 1970 census figures:

Number of Congressional Seats: 10

Total Population: 4,677,399

Ideal Population for Each Congressional District: 467,740

Actual Population for Each District Created by 1969 Act:

District

Actual Population Per 1970 Census

Variation from Ideal

First 377,097 - 90,643

Second 508,745 + 41,005

Third 376,211 - 91,529

Fourth 527,990 + 60,250

Fifth 379,619 -88,121

Sixth 462,024 - 5,716

Seventh 481,313 + 13,573

Eighth 604,525 +136,785

Ninth 551,132 + 83,392

Tenth 408,743 -58,997

None of the minor corrections in the preliminary 1970 census data substantially affects these figures.

On the basis of these 1970 census population figures, we conclude, without disagreement by any formal party, amicus curiae or any other interested person, that the 1969 Missouri Congressional Redistricting Act, supra, is unconstitutional and that no present or future Congressional preliminary election processes or primary or general elections may be held thereunder.

In early recognition of this inevitable conclusion the 76th General Assembly of Missouri at its regular session in 1971 considered legislation calculated to create in time for the 1972 elections ten new constitutionally permissible Congressional districts. Until November 22, 1971, we refrained from further judicial action with the hope that the Missouri General Assembly would be called into special session and would cause to be enacted into law, in time for the 1972 election processes a constitutionally permissible Congressional redistricting plan.

On November 22, 1971, we held a plenary evidentiary hearing to secure a basic record for action on the merits of this case when a decision was required. To give the Missouri General Assembly further time to act, action herein was stayed until January 31, 1972, when final hearings herein were held and the cause submitted. Unfortunately, no new Missouri Congressional Redistricting Act has been enacted into law as of mid-February 1972, the latest practicable time for legislative action. Now most formal and interested parties agree that we must render a decision in this case on the basis of the pretrial and trial.

So left with no alternative, reluctantly we proceed to establish by judicial action a constitutionally permissible Congressional redistricting plan for Missouri under which future primary and general elections for Congressional seats must be held until there is enacted into law by the General Assembly of Missouri a constitutionally permissible Congressional redistricting act. In doing so we will give effect as far as is practicable and legal to what we believe to be the will of the majority of the people of Missouri, as far as it can be discerned.

The federal law requires, and we willingly follow the federal standard that Article I, § 2 of the Constitution of the United States requires that “as nearly as is practicable one man’s vote in a congressional election is to be worth as much as another’s”. This rule was enunciated in Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 U.S. 1, 84 S.Ct. 526, 11 L.Ed.2d 481, and further defined in Kirkpatrick v. Preisler, supra.

In addition to this federal standard, Section 45 of Article III of the Missouri Constitution, V.A.M.S., requires that the Congressional districts “. . . be composed of contiguous territory as compact and as nearly equal in population as may be.” In devising a judicial plan of Congressional redistricting we respect and follow this state standard, as a matter of law and comity.

Some evidence of the will of the people of Missouri in some respects is found in the alignment of Congressional districts in the now obsolete 1969 Missouri Congressional Redistricting Act. To the extent practicable we give consideration to the salvageable portions of that Act.

Imperfect and to some extent inconsistent indicia of the will of the people of Missouri and their elected representatives are found in the two 1971 Congressional redistricting bills, each of which was passed by one branch of the Missouri General Assembly. Neither bill passed both branches of the Missouri General Assembly. The Missouri House of Representatives passed House Committee Substitute for Senate Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 370 containing a plan of Congressional redistricting. The Missouri Senate passed Senate Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 370 containing a substantially different plan. Neither bill passed both branches of the Missouri General Assembly, which remain in disagreement up to the present time.

Giving consideration to all factors and arguments advanced by the parties and amici curiae we have decided to establish the attached judicially devised constitutionally permissible plan for creating ten new Congressional districts from which the ten members of the United States House of Representatives from Missouri shall be elected in 1972 and in subsequent years unless and until there shall be timely enacted a new constitutionally permissible Missouri Congressional Redistrieting Act. The judicial plan is appended hereto marked “Exhibit A” and made a part as if fully set out herein in words and figures.

In this plan an effort has been made to avoid splitting counties except where necessary. Furthermore an effort has been given to retaining counties in present districts as far as practicable and legally permissible. Compactness of districts, in the degree required by state law, has been achieved.

According to figures certified at our request by the System’s Specialist, Andrew S. Loebl of the Administrative Services, Division of Budget and Comptroller of the State of Missouri, the 1970 census population figures of the judicially approved Congressional districts are as follows:

Number of Congressional Seats: 10

Total Population: 4,677,399

Ideal Population for Each Congressional District: 467,740

Actual Population for Each District Created by 1972 Judicial Pian:

District.

Actual Population Per 1970 Census

Variation from Ideal

Percent Variation from Ideal

First 468,056 + 316 + .0675%

Second 468,808 + 1,068 + .2283%

Third 467,544 - 196 - .0419%

Fourth 466,940 - 800 - .1711%

Fifth 467,457 - 283 - .0605%

Sixth 469,642 + 1,902 + .4066%

Seventh 466,699 - 1,041 - .2225%

Eighth 467,532 - 208 - .0444%

Ninth 467,990 + 250 + .0534%

Tenth 466,731 - 1,009 - .2157%

Population deviation from highest to lowest populated district Is 2943.

Percent deviation from highest to lowest populated district Is .6291%.

Most populated district is District Number 6.

Least populated district is District Number 7.

The minor variations from the ideal are constitutionally permissible under the Constitution of the United States.

We express our gratitude to the State of Missouri, and in particular to the Division of Budget and Comptroller, and the members of the Missouri General Assembly and others who assisted as amici curiae. In this connection we note that the plan established hereby was devised solely by us, and we accept full responsibility therefor.

For the foregoing reasons, it is hereby

Ordered and adjudged and declared that the 1969 Missouri Congressional Redistricting Act, Section 128.203 to and including Section 128.306 of Chapter 128, RSMo., is unconstitutional. It is further

Ordered and adjudged that the defendant Secretary of State of Missouri be, and he is hereby, permanently enjoined and restrained from holding or permitting any primary or general election or administering any preliminary election processes thereunder. It is further

Ordered and adjudged that Congressional election processes and Congressional primary and general elections in 1972 and thereafter be conducted in and from the Congressional districts established in this judgment and by Exhibit A appended hereto and made a part hereof unless and until the State of Missouri enacts a timely and constitutionally permissible new Congressional Redistricting Act and such new act is timely submitted to and approved by this Court. It is further

Ordered and adjudged that this Court retain jurisdiction to implement, enforce and amend this judgment and to make such other orders and judgments as in the premises shall be meet and just.

EXHIBIT A

The 1972 Judicial Congressional Redistricting Plan for Missouri Is set forth In words and figures.

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT NUMBER 1

St. Louis County (Part)

Normandy Township 35,800

Washington Township 18,427

Hadley Township 23,025

Lincoln Township 21,850

Jefferson Township 31,970

Clayton Township (Part) Census tracts or portions of census tracts within Clayton Township as listed:

Census Tract 2164 6,544

Census Tract 2189 7,266

Gravois Township (Part) Census tracts or portions of census tracts within Gravois Township as listed:

Census Tract 2196 2,034

Creve Coeur Township (Part) Census tracts or portions of census tracts within Creve Coeur Township as listed:

Census Tract 2159 6,458

Census Tract 2162 6,745

St. Louis City (Part) Census tracts or portions of census tracts within St. Louis City as listed:

Census Tract 1051 4,538

Census Tract 1052 6,731

Census Tract 1053 6,730

Census Tract 1054 5,358

Census Tract 1055 7,850

Census Tract 1061 9,939

Census Tract 1062 7,210

Census Tract 1063 8,325

Census Tract 1064 6,436

Census Tract 1065 7,337

Census Tract 1066 7,162

Census Tract 1067 7,589

Census Tract 1071 1,385

Census Tract 1072 2,553

Census Tract 1073 6,640

Census Tract 1074 5,891

Census Tract 1075 5,480

Census Tract 1076 4,168

Census Tract 1077 6,727

Census Tract 1081 3,952

Census Tract 1082 2,876

Census Tract 1083 2,814

Census Tract 1084 1,078

Census Tract 1085 1,778

Census Tract 1091 6,918

Census Tract 1092 401

Census Tract 1093 3,910

Census Tract 1094 2,613

Census Tract 1095 3,073

Census Tract 1101 7,446

Census Tract 1102 7,103

Census Tract 1103 7,324

Census Tract 1104 6,923

Census Tract 1105 6,209

Census Tract 1111 9,109

Census Tract 1112 7,878

Census Tract 1113 6,674

Census Tract 1114 7,357

Census Tract 1115 5,914

Census Tract 1121 7,128

Census Tract 1122 6,085

Census Tract 1123 6,166

Census Tract 1124 5,261

Census Tract 1192 5,533

Census Tract 1201 4,576

Census Tract 1202 3,908

Census Tract 1203 7,509

Census Tract 1212 6,752

Census Tract 1213 11,124

Census Tract 1214 984

Census. Tract 1252 6,080

Census Tract 1254 1,350

Census Tract 1261 5,707

Census Tract 1262 1,347

Census Tract 1263 3,897

Census Tract 1264 2,280

Census Tract 1265 2,851

468,056

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT NUMBER 2

St. Louis County (Part)

St. Ferdinand Township 72,022

Airport Township 108,477

Midland Township 55,790

Creve Coeur Township (Part) Except for census tracts or portions of census tracts within Creve Coeur Township as listed: 47,097

Except (-)

Census Tract 2159 -6,458

Census Tract 2162 -6,745

Clayton Township (Part) Except for census tracts or portions of census tracts within Clayton Township as listed: 43,792

Except (-)

Census Tract 2164 -6,544

Census Tract 2189 -7,266

Gravois Township (Part) Except for census tracts or portions of census tracts within Gravois Township as listed: 26,391

Except (-)

2196 Census Tract -2,034

2197 Census Tract -6,878

2198 Census Tract -9,052

2208.01 Census Tract -7,031

2208.02 Census Tract -5,265

2208.03 Census Tract -5,670

2212.01 Census Tract - 214

Ferguson Township (Part) Census tracts or portions of census tracts within Ferguson Township as listed: 24,402

Census Tract 2127 8,555

Census Tract 2124 2,986

Census Tract 2125 5,945

Census Tract 2126 6,720

Census Tract 2128 (Part) 196

Census Tract 2137 (Part) 0

Bonhomme Township (Part) Except for census tracts or portions of census tracts within Bonhomme Township as listed:

Except (-)

Census Tract 2216 - 1,190

Census Tract 2178.01 - 2,032

Census Tract 2178.02 - 7,797

Census Tract 2178.03 -11,224

468,808

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT NUMBER 3

St. Louis County (Part) Concord Township 58,576

Lemay Township 60,559

Gravois Township (Part) Census, tracts or portions of census tracts within Gravois Township as listed:

Census Tract 2197 6,878

Census Tract 2198 9,052

Census Tract 2208.01 7,031

Census Tract 2208.02 5,265

Census Tract 2208.03 , 5,670

Census Tract 2212.01 214

St. Louis City (Part) Census tracts or portions of census tracts within St. Louis City as listed:

Census Tract 1011 4,166

Census Tract 1012 4,436

Census Tract 1013 5,836

Census Tract 1014 4,138

Census Tract 1015 4,516

Census Tract 1016 1,345

Census Tract 1017 4,441

Census Tract 1017.99 36

Census Tract 1021 3,564

Census Tract 1022 8,274

Census Tract 1023 2,771

Census Tract 1024 3,174

Census Tract 1025 2,514

Census Tract 1031 4,419

Census Tract 1032 4,857

Census Tract 1033 1,209

Census Tract 1034 2,967

Census Tract 1035 1,049

Census Tract 1036 2,145

Census Tract 1037 3,743

Census Tract 1041 4,439

Census Tract 1042 5,716

Census Tract 1043 2,829

Census Tract 1044 668

Census Tract 1131 6,256

Census Tract 1132 3,079

Census Tract 1133 1,178

Census Tract 1134 1,420

Census Tract 1141 11,028

Census Tract 1142 6,534

Census Tract 1143 7,620

Census Tract 1151 4,612

Census Tract 1152 3,804

Census Tract 1153 7,177

Census Tract 1154 3,999

Census Tract 1155 7,447

Census Tract 1156 6,368

Census Tract 1157 5,021

Census Tract 1161 4,083

Census Tract 1162 7,011

Census Tract 1163 8,597

Census Tract 1164 6,519

Census Tract 1165 6,230

Census Tract 1171 3,052

Census Tract 1172 10,877

Census Tract 1173 7,283

Census Tract 1174 7,554

Census Tract 1181 3,815

Census Tract 1182 4,757

Census Tract 1183 591

Census Tract 1184 1,703

Census Tract 1185 3,623

Census Tract 1191 7,937

Census Tract 1193 6,164

Census Tract 1221 2,737

Census Tract 1222 270

Census Tract 1224 7,043

Census Tract 1231 8,097

Census Tract 1232 4,430

Census Tract 1233 6,289

Census Tract 1234 5,576

Census Tract 1235 50

Census Tract 1241 7,528

Census Tract 1242 5,715

Census Tract 1243 7,522

Census Tract 1244 637

Census Tract 1245 2,595

Census Tract 1251 2,397

Census Tract 1253 587

Census Tract 1211 4,235

467,544

DISTRICT FOUR

Barton County 10,431

Cass County 39,448

Bates County 15,468

Vernon County 19,065

St. Clair County 7,667

Henry County 18,451

Johnson County 34,172

Lafayette County 26,626

Saline County 24,837

Pettis County 34,137

Benton County 9,695

Hickory County 4,481

Morgan County 10,068

Cooper County 14,732

Howard County 10,561

Jackson County (Part):

Blue Township 186,188

Less Kansas City -64,596

121,592

Fort Osage Township 4,193

Prairie Township 18,369

Sni — A — Bar Township 15,244

Van Burén Township 3,602

Blue Township (Part) Census tracts or portions of census tracts within Blue Township as listed:

Census Tract 107.01 1,517

Brooking Township (Part) Census tracts or portions of census tracts within Brooking Township as listed:

Census Tract 142 156

143 2,780

144 824

145 41

125.01 4,192

125.02 3,316

125.03 1,480

127.01 6,559

127.02 594

128.02 2,642

466,940

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT NUMBER 5

Jackson County (Part)

Kaw Township 276,992

Blue Township (Part)

Kansas City City (Part) Except for cen- 63,079 sus tracts or portions of census tracts within Kansas City City as listed:

Except (-)

Census Tract 107.01 -1,517

Washington Township 85,713

Brooking Township (Part) Except for cen- 41,673 sus tracts or portions of census tracts within Brooking Township as listed:

Except (-)

Census Tract 142 - 156

Census Tract 143 -2,780

Census Tract 144 - 824

Census Tract 145 - 41

Census Tract 125.01 -4,192

Census Tract 125.02 -3,316

Census Tract 125.03 -1,480

Census Tract 127.01 -6,559

Census Tract 127.02 - 594

Census Tract 128.02 -2,642

467,457

DISTRICT SIX

Adair 22,472

Atchison County 9,240

Nodaway County 22,467

Worth County 3,359

Harrison County 10,257

Mercer County 4,910

Holt County 6,654

Andrew County 11,913

Gentry County 8,060

Daviess 8,420

Grundy County 11,819

Sullivan County 7,572

Buchanan County 86,915

Clinton County 12,462

Caldwell County 8,351

Livingston County 15,368

Linn County 15,125

Platte County 32,081

Clay County 123,644

Ray County 17,599

Carroll County 12,565

Chariton County 11,084

DeKalb County 7,305

469,642

DISTRICT SEVEN

Jasper County 79,852

Newton County 32,901

McDonald County 12,357

Dade County 6,850

Lawrence County 24,585

Barry County 19,597

Polk County 15,415

Dallas County 10,054

Laclede County 19,944

Greene County 152,929

Webster County 15,562

Wright County 13,667

Christian County 15,124

Douglas County 9,268

Stone County 9,921

Taney County 13,023

Ozark County 6,226

Cedar County 9,424

466,699

DISTRICT EIGHT

Howell County 23,521i

Oregon County 9,180

Texas County 18,320

Shannon County 7,196

Dent County 11,457

Pulaski County 53,967

Crawford County 14,828

Washington County 15,086

Franklin County 55,116

Gasconade County 11,878

Maries County 6,851

Miller County 15,026

Cole County 46,228

Osage County 10,994

Boone County 80,911

Camden County 13,315

Moniteau County 10,742

Phelps County 29,567

St. Louis County (Part):

Meramec Township 11,106

Bonhomme Township (Part) Census tracts or portions of census tracts within Bonhomme Township as listed:

Census Tract 2216 1,190

2178.01 Census Tract 2,032

2178.02 Census Tract 7,797

2178.03 Census Tract 11,224

467,532

NINE DISTRICT

Callaway County 25,950

Putnam County 5,916

Macon County 15,432

Schuyler County 4,665

Scotland County 5,499

Clark County 8,260

Knox County 5,692

Lewis County 10,993

Shelby County 7,906

Marion County 28,121

Randolph County 22,434

Monroe County 9,542

Ralls County 7,764

Audrain County 25,362

Pike County 16,928

Montgomery County 11,000

Lincoln County 18,041

St. Charles County 92,954

St. Louis County (Part):

Spanish Lake Township 40,905

Florissant Township 78,551

Ferguson Township (Part) Except for census tracts or portions of census tracts within Ferguson Township as listed: 16,376

Except (-)

2127 -8,555 Census Tract

2124 -2,986 Census Tract

21.25 -5,945 Census Tract

2126 -6,720 Census Tract

2128 (Part) - 196 2137 (Part) - 0 Census Tract Census Tract

Warren County 9,699

467,990

DISTRICT TEN

Dunklin County 33,742

Pemiscot County 26,373

New Madrid County 23,420

Mississippi County 16,647

Butler County 33,529

Ripley County 9,803

Stoddard County 25,771

Scott County 33,250

Carter County 3,878

Reynolds County 6/106

Wayne County 8,546

Bollinger County 8,820

Cape Girardeau County 49,350

Iron County 9,259

St. Francois County 36,818

St. Genevieve County 12,867

Jefferson County 105,248

Perry County 14,393

Madison County 8,641

466,731

. One of whom, Paul W. Preisler, Esquire, has since died.

WILLIAM H. BECKER, Chief District Judge

(specially concurring):

The plan approved by the per curiam, opinion and judgment is constitutionally sound and permissible. It also has many meritorious features from a high level political standpoint, even though it obviously will not please everyone. Indeed it is impossible to devise a plan which will please everyone.

My initial proposal was to adopt with minor improvements the plan contained in the House Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 370. It was statistically the better of the two plans of the Missouri House and Senate. As a matter of principle this initial proposal would have given life to the best of the two proposals of the Missouri General Assembly. Thereby the representatives of the people of Missouri would have participated in the formulation of the judicial plan to the fullest extent possible under the circumstances. And the inclusion of this permissible judicial technique would in the future provide a motive for healthy competition between the branches of state legislatures in approaching the ideal in case agreement between the two branches again becomes impossible.