Scalione v. Bosch (12 F.2d 172, 1926)

ROBB, J. Associate Justice.

This interfer-

ence involves the same applications of the parties Scalione and Bosch that were involved in the prior interference, patent appeal No. 1824, — App. D. C. — , 12 F.(2d) 171, just decided, and the same contentions are made. It follows that the rulings made in that case are controlling here, and accordingly the decision is affirmed.

Affirmed.