Brill v. Cohen & Miller Advertising, Inc. (221 F.2d 868, 1955)

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit 1955-02-24

Citations

Full opinion text

PER CURIAM.

The sole issue is whether the evidence is sufficient to support the findings of fact upon which the trial court concluded that the payment to appellee Cohen & Miller Advertising, Inc. “constituted a preference but not a voidable preference under the Bankruptcy Act [11 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq.].” Since we think the evidence is sufficient, the judgment below is

Affirmed.