Citations
- 333 F.2d 766
Full opinion text
PER CURIAM
Defendant Pellom has appealed from final order denying his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 motion to vacate sentence. The present motion filed November 22, 1963, is defendant’s fourth motion collaterally attacking his conviction.
The present motion attacks the convie-tjon upon different grounds than urged in the prior motions. After considering the present motion on its merits, the court determined that the defendant was entitled to no relief under either Rule 35 or 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 and denied the motion, This appeal followed,
Defendant, represented by counsel of his own choosing, entered a voluntary piea of guilty to counts two to seveil) inclusive, of an indictment against him. Count one was dismissed. His plea of guilty was accepted by the court. On May 2o, 1955, defendant was sentenced to a term of five years upon each of the six counts upon which he stood convicted, the sentences to run consecutively. He took no appeal. Defendant here makes no at-ta<* upon f118 conviction and sentence with respect to counts four and seven of the indictment and hence no discussion of suc coun 8 18 re