Wehrle v. Brooks (379 F.2d 288, 1967)

PER CURIAM:

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the District Court. 269 F.Supp. 785.

See, also, Randleman v. Boeres, 93 Cal. App. 745, 270 P. 374 (1928); Thompson v. Taylor, 183 So.2d 16 (Fla.App. 1966); Nicholson v. Roop, 62 N.W.2d 473, 43 A.L.R.2d 1031 (N.D.1954).

Affirmed.