Roberts v. United States (385 F.2d 418, 1967)

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 1967-11-16

Citations

Full opinion text

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of the judgment of the district court convicting him of violating the Dyer Act (18 U.S.C. § 2312). His assignments all concern the sufficiency of the evidence to support the finding of guilt and the propriety of the court’s ruling permitting the prosecution to reopen its case in chief. None has merit, nor tenders a question which on this record warrants discussion in an opinion.

We affirm.