McElroy v. Beto (453 F.2d 1369, 1972)

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed. See Local Rule 21.

. In his habeas petition filed below, the appellant contended that he was convicted on the basis of insufficient evidence, and that his privately-retained counsel rendered ineffective representation.

. See N.L.R.B. v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966.