Citations
- 272 N.Y. 180
Full opinion text
Per Curiam.
A single question of power in the Supreme Court is involved in the certified question.
Upon this record we find no abuse (as matter of law) of the discretionary power of the Supreme Court. (Hatch v. Central Nat. Bank, 78 N. Y. 487, 489; Matter of Tilden, 98 N. Y. 434, 439; Ladd v. Stevenson, 112 N. Y. 325.) This leads to an affirmance.
We leave the merits to be determined upon the new trial which has been granted.
The order should be affirmed, with costs, and the question certified answered in the affirmative.
Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Pinch, JJ., concur; Crane, Ch. J., taldng no part.
Order affirmed, etc.