Schafran & Finkel, Inc. v. M. Lowenstein & Sons, Inc. (280 N.Y. 687, 1939)

New York Court of Appeals 1939-04-11

Citations

Full opinion text

Motion for reargument denied with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. There is no stay preventing defendant from < proceeding according to the provisions of the Arbitration Law. Neither is there any intimation in the opinion that there was, or was not, a contract. We were dealing simply with the pleadings as they were. (See 280 N. Y. 164.)