State v. Meador (123 Ohio St. 3d 450, 2009)

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is not accepted.

{¶ 2} The discretionary cross-appeal is accepted.

{¶ 3} The judgment of the court of appeals holding as moot the assignment of error in which appellant below challenged the sufficiency of the evidence is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for consideration of that assignment of error.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.