State v. Zuranski (32 Ohio St. 3d 379, 1987)

This cause (court of appeals No. 50447) is allowed as to Proposition of Law No. XV only, and as so allowed is reversed on authority of State v. Penix (1987), 32 Ohio St. 3d 369, 513 N.E. 2d 744, and remanded to the trial court for resentencing in accordance with that decision.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.

Holmes, J., dissents.

Holmes, J,

dissenting. I dissent for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in State v. Penix (1987), 32 Ohio St. 3d 369, 513 N.E. 2d 744.