Citations
- 92 Ohio St. 3d 217
Full opinion text
The discretionary appeal is allowed and the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Littrell v. Wigglesworth (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 425, 746 N.E.2d 1077, and Clark v. Scarpelli (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 271, 744 N.E.2d 719.
Elk & Elk Co., L.P.A., and Todd O. Rosenberg, for appellants.
Brown, Bemiller, Murray & McIntyre, L.L.P., and J. Jeffrey Heck, for appellee.
Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur in judgment.
Cook, J.,
concurring in judgment. I concur in judgment based on the reasoning set forth in my dissenting opinion in Littrell v. Wigglesworth (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 425, 746 N.E.2d 1077, and in my opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part in Clark v. Scarpelli (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 271, 744 N.E.2d 719.
Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., concur in the foregoing opinion.