De Veaux v. Board of Public Instruction of Dade County (104 So. 2d 611, 1958)

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of Armistead v. State ex rel. Smyth, Fla.1949, 41 So.2d 879; Bradshaw v. Pinkston, Fla.1951, 53 So.2d 525. See also Pippin v. State ex rel. Town of Blountstown, 73 Fla. 363, 74 So. 653, 655; and State ex rel. Burr v. Tavares & G. R. Co., 78 Fla. 329, 82 So. 833, 835.

CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and HORTON, J., concur.

PEARSON, J., concurs specially.

PEARSON, Judge

(concurring special-bO-

While I agree that the discharge of the writ of mandamus was without error because the object sought to be accomplished was then moot, I feel that this final judgment was not determinative of all the issues in the cause. The petitioner should be left to such other remedy as may be available to her.