McKenzie v. McKenzie (108 So. 2d 624, 1959)

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully examined the record on appeal from which it appears that the testimony, though conflicting, amply supports the finding of the Chancellor, and the appellant has failed to clearly demonstrate error.

Affirmed on the authority of Travis v. Travis, 1921, 81 Fla. 309, 87 So. 762.

STURGIS, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.